´¡´Ú³Ù±ð°ùÌýFisher: What the Supreme Court's Ruling Means for Students, Colleges, and the CountryJune 28, 2016ÌýNational Press Club
Briefing AgendaÌý(±Ê¶Ù¹ó)
Biographical Sketches of PanelistsÌý(±Ê¶Ù¹ó)
Fact Sheets:
Constitutional Findings of the Ruling and Implications for Civil RightsÌý(±Ê¶Ù¹ó)Theodore M. Shaw, J.D., University of North Carolina School of Law at Chapel Hill
Reaffirming the Compelling Interest in Diversity and Scientific Research on the Benefits of DiversityÌý(±Ê¶Ù¹ó) Angelo Ancheta, J.D., M.P.A., Santa Clara University School of Law
The Evidence on Race-Neutral Alternatives to Race-Conscious AdmissionsÌý(±Ê¶Ù¹ó) Liliana M. Garces, Ed.D., J.D., Pennsylvania State University
Demography, Data, and Policies Beyond AdmissionsÌý(±Ê¶Ù¹ó) Stella M. Flores, Ed.D., New York University
Ìý(±Ê¶Ù¹ó)Gary Orfield, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles
Research Reports/Articles on Fisher and Affirmative Action:
Two Decades After the Affirmative Action Ban: Evaluating the University of California's Race-Neutral Efforts (PDF)William C. Kidder, University of CaliforniaPatricia Gandara, The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles and UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies
Dynamic Diversity: Toward a Contextual Understanding of Critical Mass Liliana M. Garces, Ed.D., J.D., Pennsylvania State University Uma M. Jayakumar, University of San Francisco Texas Top Ten Percent Plan: How It Works, What Are Its Limits, and Recommendations to Consider Stella M. Flores, Ed.D., New York University Catherine L. Horn, University of Houston and the Institute for Educational Policy Research and Evaluation
Ìý(±Ê¶Ù¹ó)Felice J., Levine, 91ɬÂþAngelo N. Ancheta,ÌýSanta Clara University School of Law
News Stories:
The Conversation, June 24, 2016 The New York Times, June 23, 2016
Ìý